What evidence is there that the digital divide in the UK is narrowing between:
a. young and old?
There are significant increases of around 30% in the two youngest ranges, this is mirrored in the 60-69 range but not so in the over 70's, with only an increase of 9%. Looked at another way you could say that for 70+ going from 3 to 12 percent is a 4 fold increase(?)
As far as the divide goes there is still significant different from the youngest ranges compared to the older ranges, both increasing but still a wide divide, even a slight widening in favour of the young.
There are significant increases of around 30% in the two youngest ranges, this is mirrored in the 60-69 range but not so in the over 70's, with only an increase of 9%. Looked at another way you could say that for 70+ going from 3 to 12 percent is a 4 fold increase(?)
As far as the divide goes there is still significant different from the youngest ranges compared to the older ranges, both increasing but still a wide divide, even a slight widening in favour of the young.
b. men and women?
There is a general trend for men to be higher users than women until you look at women in the 16-19 range in more recent years, I would suggest that the rise of social-networks and mobile phones are the main leaders for this increase with young girls being ever more active in the use of these media.
There is a general trend for men to be higher users than women until you look at women in the 16-19 range in more recent years, I would suggest that the rise of social-networks and mobile phones are the main leaders for this increase with young girls being ever more active in the use of these media.
A lot of the conclusions above are very much governed by the way that statistics are looked at. Disraeli's saying that "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." is a phrase that I certainly hold true.
One thought that I had was that someone in the 16-19 range in 2001/2 would more than likely be part of the 20-29 range by 2007/8 and so on with those surveyed who are near the top of their age range in 2001/2. This means that there is a migration from one age group to another through the life of the study. I think that this potentially means that, taking 70+ as an example, the increase we see from 3% (2001/2) to 12% (2007/8) may be largely catered for by this migration - meaning that there are only a nominal number of new 70+ users during the period.
No comments:
Post a Comment